Strategic Response Model
The Strategic Response Model (SRM) provides a structured framework for capturing, documenting, and tracing how organizations respond to internal and external changes. It links triggers (what happened) to rationales (why we're responding) to responses (what we're doing) across business architecture domains.
Schema Version: 2.1
Schema Location: /schemas/extensions/strategic-response-model.schema.json
Specification: JSON Schema Draft-07
Overview
What is the Strategic Response Model?
The SRM is a governance extension that ensures organizational responses are:
- Traceable — Every action links back to a documented trigger or strategic intent
- Justified — Rationales explicitly capture the reasoning behind decisions
- Measurable — Performance indicators track success and enable adaptation
- Auditable — Complete chains from trigger to outcome support governance reviews
Why Use the Strategic Response Model?
| Challenge | How SRM Helps |
|---|---|
| "Why did we start this initiative?" | Traces to documented trigger and rationale |
| "Is this aligned with strategy?" | Links responses to strategic objectives |
| "Who approved this change?" | Records accountability and decision points |
| "How do we know it's working?" | Connects to performance indicators |
| "What else was affected?" | Maps impact across domains |
SRM Components
The Strategic Response Model comprises five interconnected components:
1. Strategic Intent
Proactive, forward-looking initiatives that drive organizational change. Unlike triggers (which are reactive), strategic intents represent deliberate choices to pursue opportunities.
Examples:
- "Become the market leader in sustainable products by 2027"
- "Achieve 50% digital channel adoption"
- "Build AI-first customer service capabilities"
2. Triggers
Events, insights, or conditions that prompt a response. Triggers are categorized into families for consistent analysis.
Trigger Categories:
- Regulatory or compliance
- Technological change
- Environmental & safety
- Operational transformation
- Strategic re-alignment
- Customer & stakeholder
- Workforce & skills
- Performance response
- Political or social
- Innovation-led opportunity
→ See Trigger Schema for full documentation.
3. Rationales
The reasoned justification for responding to a trigger or pursuing a strategic intent. Rationales bridge the "what happened" (trigger) to the "what we're doing" (response).
Rationale Elements:
- Description of reasoning
- Linked domains affected
- Confidence level
- Alternatives considered
- Evidence base
→ See Rationale Schema for full documentation.
4. Responses
The aligned changes or activities captured in other business architecture domains. Responses specify what is changing across:
- Strategy — Adjustments to goals or strategic direction
- Capabilities — Development, enhancement, or decommissioning
- Initiatives — Programs or projects started or stopped
- Policy — Introduction or amendment of rules
- Performance — Redefinition or reweighting of KPIs
- Information — Changes to data usage or governance
- Value Stream — Refinements in end-to-end value delivery
5. Performance Indicators
Quantifiable metrics that evaluate success, efficiency, or impact of the response. Performance indicators close the loop by measuring whether the response achieved its intended outcome.
→ See Performance Indicators for full documentation.
How the SRM Works
Example: Regulatory Compliance Response
Example: Proactive Strategic Initiative
Domain-Specific Responses
The SRM captures responses across all Orthogramic domains, with domain-specific attributes:
Strategy Domain Responses
| Response Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Goal adjustment | Modifying strategic objectives |
| Strategic pivot | Fundamental direction change |
| Timeline revision | Changing strategic milestones |
Capability Domain Responses
| Response Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Capability build | Creating new capability |
| Capability enhancement | Improving existing capability |
| Capability decommission | Retiring capability |
Initiative Domain Responses
| Response Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Program launch | Starting new program |
| Project acceleration | Fast-tracking delivery |
| Initiative cancellation | Stopping work |
Policy Domain Responses
| Response Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Policy creation | New policy introduced |
| Policy amendment | Existing policy modified |
| Policy retirement | Policy no longer applicable |
Finance Domain Responses
| Response Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Budget reallocation | Shifting financial resources |
| Investment approval | New capital expenditure |
| Cost optimization | Reducing operational costs |
Risk Management Domain Responses
| Response Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Risk mitigation | Implementing controls |
| Risk acceptance | Documented risk tolerance |
| Risk transfer | Insurance or outsourcing |
Impacted Organizational Units
The SRM tracks which organizational units are affected by responses using standardized relationship roles:
{
"impactedUnits": [
{
"unitId": "retail-banking",
"relationshipRole": "accountable",
"impactDescription": "Primary owner of compliance implementation"
},
{
"unitId": "enterprise-technology",
"relationshipRole": "responsible",
"impactDescription": "Delivers technical solution"
},
{
"unitId": "legal-compliance",
"relationshipRole": "consulted",
"impactDescription": "Provides regulatory interpretation"
},
{
"unitId": "all-business-units",
"relationshipRole": "informed",
"impactDescription": "Affected by policy changes"
}
]
}
Relationship roles align with the Inter-Unit Relationships model.
Monitoring and Review
The SRM includes monitoring cadence to ensure responses remain effective:
| Cadence | Use Case |
|---|---|
| Monthly | High-priority regulatory responses |
| Quarterly | Strategic initiative progress |
| Six-monthly | Capability development programs |
| Annual | Long-term strategic alignment review |
Monitoring Elements
{
"monitoring": {
"cadence": "quarterly",
"reviewBody": "Strategy Committee",
"adjustmentAuthority": "CIO",
"escalationPath": "Executive Committee",
"nextReviewDate": "2025-03-31",
"adjustmentHistory": [
{
"date": "2024-12-15",
"adjustment": "Extended timeline by 3 months",
"reason": "Resource constraints identified"
}
]
}
}
Integration Points
The SRM connects to other Orthogramic extensions:
| Extension | Integration |
|---|---|
| Cross-Domain Relationships | Responses use cross-domain verbs (enables, transforms, etc.) |
| Inter-Unit Relationships | Impacted units use standardized roles |
| Performance Domain | KPIs link to domain performance indicators |
| Initiatives Domain | Response initiatives reference the Initiatives domain |
Usage Guidelines
When to Create an SRM Entry
- Regulatory or compliance changes requiring organizational response
- Significant market shifts affecting strategy
- Performance threshold breaches requiring intervention
- Technology changes enabling new capabilities
- Strategic planning decisions requiring traceability
Modeling Best Practices
- Start with the trigger — Clearly document what prompted the response
- Justify with rationale — Explain the reasoning, not just the action
- Specify affected domains — Map all impacted areas
- Define success criteria — Link to measurable performance indicators
- Assign accountability — Use standardized organizational roles
- Set review cadence — Ensure ongoing monitoring
The SRM maps well to data lineage and impact analysis patterns. Triggers can be connected to data quality alerts, rationales to business impact assessments, and responses to data pipeline changes. Consider integrating SRM entries with your data observability platform.
Related Documentation
- Trigger Schema — Detailed trigger documentation
- Rationale Schema — Detailed rationale documentation
- Performance Indicators — KPI schema and usage
- SRM JSON Schema — Complete schema reference